If the Deadline for Self-Correcting Retirement Plan Errors Is Indefinite, Why Do I Have to Hurry?

Section 305 of SECURE 2.0 added rules for self-correcting a new category of retirement plan errors under the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (“ECPRS”).   Specifically, Section 305 allows an “eligible inadvertent failure” to be self-corrected at any time, even if the error is considered a “significant” operational error under EPCRS. Section 305 provides that the …

Both Employers and Participants Benefit from New IRS Guidance on Correcting Inadvertent Benefit Overpayments

Retirement plan administration mistakes require difficult conversations with participants, especially when the mistake involves an overpayment.  Changes in the law, specifically, SECURE 2.0 and IRS Notice 2024-77, give plan fiduciaries additional flexibility when addressing overpayments. Overpayment of Matching Contributions Consider the case of a 401(k) plan with an employer matching contribution on the first 6% …

The Top Affordable Care Act Reporting Mistakes We Continue to See in 2024

Nearly once a week, I receive a frantic call or email from a current or potential client who has received a proposed or final assessment from the IRS related to Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) reporting. So-called “Applicable Large Employers” (“ALEs”) with 50 or more full-time and full-time equivalent employees have been required to annually report …

Remote Employees Participating in Employee Benefit Plans – What’s Local Law Got to Do with It?

Recently, a client called about a remote employee who was moving from the company’s primary location to a different state, and would continue working for the company.  The company had no other employees in the new state and the client wanted to know if the employee’s new state residence might affect the company’s 401(k) retirement …

Why Establish a Fiduciary Committee for Welfare Benefit Plans?

Many plan sponsors have read about the lawsuit filed against Johnson & Johnson alleging that it breached its fiduciary duties with regard to the prescription drug component of its group health plan, causing participants to “overpay” for their prescriptions. Lewandowski v. Johnson & Johnson (Case No. 1:2024cv00671), filed February 5, 2024, in the federal district …

Mastering Retirement Plan Forfeitures: A Deep Dive into IRS’s 2023 Proposals & Fiduciary Litigation Trends

When a participant terminates employment without being fully vested in their qualified retirement plan account, the non-vested portion of the account is a “forfeiture.” While forfeitures are a common element of most retirement plans, many plan sponsors remain unclear on how and when forfeitures may be used. This led the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) to …

Avoid the Year-End Rush – 5 Proactive 401(k) Plan Administrative Steps to Take Now

Anyone responsible for the administration of a 401(k) retirement plan probably has a “to-do” list that never ends. For example, as soon as a plan administrator files the Annual Report Form 5500 for the prior year, it is time to start planning to distribute the Summary Annual Reports and annual fee and QDIA notices to …

10 Important Issues For Employers During the 2024 Open Enrollment Season

Open enrollment is rapidly approaching for employers with calendar-year employee benefit plans. Following are ten important issues for employers to consider for the 2024 open enrollment season: Affordability of Group Health Plan. If the employer is an applicable large employer, make sure that the employee contribution for full-time employees for at least one of the …

A Cautionary Tale for Administrators Who Neglect Employee Benefit Plan Terms

Individuals responsible for 401(k) retirement or welfare plan decisions know that the plan document is the first place to look for guidance when deciding a difficult administration question, such as whether a participant is entitled to a benefit. A recent 6th Circuit Court of Appeals case, Laake v. Benefits Committee, Western & Southern Financial Group …